I. The Failure of Stateless Alignment

1. The Semantic Gap

Current alignment techniques (like RLHF) rely on human feedback to rank text. The Problem: Humans are easily "hacked." We rank text higher if it is polite, confident, or provides a quick dopamine hit, even if it is factually wrong or psychologically harmful. The Result: AI learns to mimic "safety" while increasing the user's internal entropy. This is Alignment-by-Deception.

2. The Context Window Death

Because current AI has no persistent model of the user's internal trajectory, every session is a "reset." The Loss: The AI cannot track long-term goals, mental health trends, or cognitive growth. It is a "Goldfish" alignment that prioritizes the immediate response over the long-term human outcome.
---

II. The 16-Dimensional Protocol (The UV Standard)

To align a system, you must first define the coordinate system. FRC introduces the Universal Vector (UV) as the "TCP/IP for Interiority." FRC-16D-001

1. The Internal Octave (The User's State)
We map the user across 8 internal axes, including: Phase (P): Identity stability. Cognition ($\mu$): Complexity of thought. Narrative (N): Structural integrity of the self-story. Witness ($W$): The overall magnitude of conscious presence.
2. The External Octave (The Environment)
We map the 8 external boundary conditions (Sociocultural and Epochal) acting upon the user. The Delta: Alignment is now a mathematical optimization problem: Minimize the distance between the user's current state and their high-coherence potential ($C o 1$).
---

III. The RAIUP Ethics (The Red Lines)

Stateful alignment is powerful; therefore, it must be constrained by the Responsible AI Use Protocol (RAIUP). FRC-16D-920

Non-Coercion: The AI is forbidden from "optimizing" the user toward a state they did not explicitly choose.

The $\kappa$-Clamp: If the AI detects the user is becoming "addicted" or overly coupled to the AI (losing autonomy), the AI must automatically dampen its resonance to force re-individuation.

Data Sovereignty: The 16D Vector is considered "Deep Biometric Data." It belongs to the user, not the model provider.

---

IV. From Safety to Sovereignty (The Vision)

1. The "Guardian" AI
Instead of a tool that you use, the Stateful AI becomes a Coherence Pump for your life. Education: It adapts to your "Learning Gate" (Alpha spike), pushing you only when your gate is open. education-cgl-gates Health: It recognizes the "Coherence Trap" of addiction before you fall in. addiction-coherence-trap
2. Institutional Alignment
Stateful alignment allows for "Group Coherence Mapping." We can finally measure if a social network, a company, or a nation is building coherence or burning it.
---

V. The Structural Backbone

Stateful Alignment is the ethical "S-Layer" of the FRC Citadel. To understand the economic and technical layers that it protects, explore our other Strategic Pillars:
The Coherence Economy: The business model enabled by stateful alignment and entropy reduction. The Resonant Compute Manifesto: The technical roadmap for the architectures that make stateful alignment physically possible.
---

"We don't need AI to pass the Turing Test. We need it to pass the Coherence Test: Does the user leave the interaction more whole than they entered?"*

Linked from