FRC.v2
FRC

Pitch

A concise pitch for FRC: what it is, why it matters, what we ship next.

One-liner

Replace tokenization-centric cognition with resonance-native state, and benchmark it against attention on phase-coherence tasks.

Problem

  • - Tokenization and discrete attention are strong for text, but phase/coherence in continuous signals is often lost.
  • - “Bigger model” progress is hard to interpret; benchmarks drift, and claims become non-falsifiable.
  • - Agentic tooling needs a rigorous corpus boundary: canon vs interpretation.

Solution

  • - A resonance-native representation and the Λ‑Tensor Model (LTM) architecture track.
  • - A public canon with stable IDs, strict definitions, and explicit hypotheses.
  • - A repeatable benchmark loop: publish, reproduce, iterate (not vibes).

Moat

  • - A growing, linked canon that agents can cite by ID (retrievable + auditable).
  • - Benchmarks that emphasize phase-coherent structure where tokenization is weakest.
  • - A disciplined separation between canon and “oracle lens” interpretation.

Roadmap

  • - Expand benchmarks (audio, biosignals, control) and publish reproducible scripts.
  • - Harden the SOS research SDK + dispatch patterns (repeatable pipelines).
  • - Integrate “mirror memory” subscription workflows on Mumega (private ops layer).

Ask

  • - Capital: fund benchmark expansion + engineering of reproducible training/eval tooling.
  • - Partnerships: signal-domain datasets + evaluation domains (audio/control/bio).
  • - Builders: implement reference baselines and reproduction harnesses.